bokeh-server gets placed the same place that any python python package places scripts. On my machine it’s the bin directory:
On Windows it should be in the Scripts directory.
Regarding ‘static’, it looks like there is a bug in the setup.py. (I am usually using “python setup.py devjs” I’ll make sure to add testing “setup.py install” to our checklist). I should be able to fix this in master late today.
About the tools, they are both on! We should have added better documentation, but the wheel zoom works automatically if you hold down shift key while you scroll. We tried having it always on without the key press, but then it messes with page scrolling. If we can figure out a way to not start zooming if the user is in the middle of scrolling the page, we will change it to that. Or maybe this could be made configurable if someone does not mind the zoom/page scroll interaction.
I managed to get bokeh-server running from the top-level directory of the latest git checkout.
When running line_server.ipynb example the bokeh-server complains about not being able to find (404) /bokehjs/static/js/bokeh.js
Renaming release --> static removes the error messages but no plots show when I call show in the notebook
Is this a bug or am I doing something wrong?
I have bokeh 0.4 installed but AFAICS neither site-packages nor Scripts contain bokeh-server so I have to run it from a source checkout?
Whilst I’m here, the new box-zoom functionality is great, but I’d still love to be able to have both pan and wheel-zoom selected at the same time. Is that something that’s in the roadmap?
Python 2.7.5 |Anaconda 1.8.0 (64-bit)| (default, Jul 1 2013, 12:37:52) [MSC v.1500 64 bit (AMD64)] on win32
Bokeh which comes with Anaconda on windows doesn’t have the bokeh-server script anywhere AFAICS.
‘bokeh-server’ is not recognized as an internal or external command,
operable program or batch file.
Python 2.7.5 |Anaconda 1.9.0 (64-bit)| (default, Jul 1 2013, 12:37:52) [MSC v.1500 64 bit (AMD64)] on win32
Type “help”, “copyright”, “credits” or “license” for more information.
On Wednesday, 5 February 2014 15:29:48 UTC, Bryan Van de ven wrote:
On Feb 5, 2014, at 8:21 AM, [email protected] wrote: